Why using CULA in matlab is slower than MKL
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Why using CULA in matlab is slower than MKL
by areslp » Wed Mar 13, 2013 6:48 pm
- areslp
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:07 am
Re: Why using CULA in matlab is slower than MKL
by john » Thu Mar 14, 2013 7:02 am
Your two tests are exercising different code paths in SVD. One is N,N (no vectors) and the other is A,A (all vectors).
Keep in mind that your GPU is rather weak, so it might not produce great numbers.
Keep in mind that your GPU is rather weak, so it might not produce great numbers.
- john
- Administrator
- Posts: 587
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:31 pm
Re: Why using CULA in matlab is slower than MKL
by areslp » Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:13 am
Thanks, I change 'AA' to 'NN', and the performance in benchmark is coincident with it in matlab.
- areslp
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:07 am
3 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to General CULA Discussion
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest